Scoldog on 3D Printed Shoes Make Bigfoot Tracks.Greg A on Learn To Play Guitar, Digitally.Jason on Soil Moisture Sensor Coating Lessons Learned The Hard Way.Tom on Electric Jet Engine Uses 3D Printed Compressor, Skips The Turbine Altogether.John Smith on Electric Jet Engine Uses 3D Printed Compressor, Skips The Turbine Altogether.Derek Anderson on Soil Moisture Sensor Coating Lessons Learned The Hard Way.Ben on 3D Printed Shoes Make Bigfoot Tracks.DerAxeman on Electric Jet Engine Uses 3D Printed Compressor, Skips The Turbine Altogether.Morberis on Soil Moisture Sensor Coating Lessons Learned The Hard Way.
And of course, the new drive to get the only things in the air to be either the 'meat in a can' airliners or Amazon delivery drones is not helping one bit. There has not been a truly "new" Category 23 aircraft in decades because the FAA is so slow to approve new engines. There are no $100 hamburger flights anymore – now they are closer to $1000. The FAA’s over-regulation (medical certificate rule rewrites, ‘nanny-state’ certification requirements unfunded mandates no-appeal snap noise abatement or “flying too loud in glide-path” fines because Karen MovedToLiveByAirport is having a snit closing ‘under utilized’ fields onerous background check requirements no-knock hangar inspections ‘random’ flight-line inspections with ‘optional’ fines fee increases, etc) has gotten so severe that there are folks going either the EAA route (homebuilt aircraft), Ultralights (<254 lb, Category 107) or flying simulators. Small airport private pilots who fly mostly piston (single or dual) aircraft. Posted in drone hacks Tagged 18650, 3d printed, FPV, minimalist, quadcopter Post navigation It’s an experiment in minimalism that really embraces the possibilities afforded by low-cost desktop 3D printing, and we wouldn’t be surprised to see it become the standard by which future designs are measured. We’ve seen quite a few 3D printed quadcopter frames over the years, but certainly none as elegant as what has created here. So while the total cost of building one of these birds might be appealing to the newbie, it’s probably a project best left to those who’ve clocked a few hours in on the sticks. There’s also a decent amount of close-quarters soldering involved given the cramped nature of the frame. Of course, the argument could be made that such a wispy quadcopter is more likely to be obliterated on impact than something larger and commercially produced. While there’s still considerable expense in the radio and video gear, this design looks like it could be an exceptionally affordable way to get into FPV flying. While says the overall performance of this diminutive quadcopter isn’t exactly stellar, we think the 10 minutes of flight time he’s reporting on a single 18650 battery is more than respectable. Spend a few hours during the week printing out frames, and you’ll have plenty to destroy for the weekend. Since the two-piece frame can be produced on a standard desktop 3D printer in a little over two hours with less than $1 USD of filament, crashes promise to be far less stressful.
Which is why many serious fliers will have a 3D printer at home to rapidly run off replacement parts.Īvid first person view (FPV) flier has taken this concept to its ultimate extreme by designing a 3D printable quadcopter that’s little more than an 18650 cell with some motors attached.
In fact, it’s more like a rite of passage. When somebody builds a quadcopter with the express purpose of flying it as fast and aggressively as possible, it’s not exactly a surprise when they eventually run it into an immovable object hard enough to break something.
0 kommentar(er)
